20 Comments

Thanks koppy! I always appreciate a good 80's-90's movie tie-in. I still cant wrap my brain around the reasons we appear to be seeing the same basic features in the environment AND in the blood. Something just does not add up. But I think I'll leave that to the Big Brains to chew on. It's been a real learning experience just sitting in and picking up what I can. I'll keep observing and documenting. Who knows? Some of it may prove useful.

Expand full comment

Awesome images and definitely helpful new information contained. You have upped the clarity and sharpness of your images while I have gone blurry.

Wondrous Willy Work Was Williams Wish huh.

Expand full comment

nonsense matt. your work is routinely incredible and inspiring. i dont even know what to make of your latest findings. its almost too shocking to believe. what the hell are we living through, and what is it all leading to?

Expand full comment

Hi Will - truly beautiful images.. deffinitely looking plant-like, some of these reminded me of one of David's last sets of images one of which could be included in this lineup of yours:

8 nov davidnixonsubstack.com/p/dental-differences picture #15 - might be the one Danyele has referred to. Exquisitely beautiful and menacing., this triffid? was in dental anaesthetic....so similar, plantlike.

Your last image here, above reminds me of the Terminator's severed wrist, hand going after Linda Hamilton in the machining warehouse scene! omg

Expand full comment

What do you mean by "environmental filament"? Intriguing. Random fibers found in nature?

Expand full comment

just that. or rather, fibers that routinely make their way into my residence. wherever they come from, they have a tendency to make their way onto my slides. I imagine some come from clothing, some from nature, some from people. but many appear to just sift through the environment. they contain peculiar features and seem to exhibit unique behaviors. I can only speculate as to their origin but I'm concerned they may not all be the byproduct of routine daily existence. and they're everywhere!

Expand full comment

Definitely not the byproduct of our existence. Can you speak more as to the unique behaviors you are seeing?

Expand full comment

I can. But I'm going to try to choose my words carefully. Many fibers/filaments appear to have a plasticized or polymer-like appearance under microscopy. They seem to exhibit unusual tension-reflexology or perhaps static receptivity. They often appear to "anticipate" interaction; flexing and twisting without direct physical contact. Their presence is ubiquitous; in my environment they always appear, without exception. And finally, I believe they may serve as a payload dispersal method. That's what I'm seeking evidence of. Many of my personal observations seem to indicate this possibility. It's difficult to catch "in the act", but I see many fibers that show signs of catastrophic ruptures. When immersed in some fluids, signs of debri can also be found. I've come very close to filming this rupture phenomenon, but I dont have the smoking gun just yet.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 21, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Pretty sure I haven't, but it does sound interesting. Thanks a ton for sharing, I'll have a look. I can see the potential overlaps with what we're looking at...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Nov 22, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Thanks for these links!

What I have seen are definitely multiwalled GO structures with similar, yet other unfolding patterns.

At least, these are not aliens, but mad man made objects that shall soon be demystified. :)

Regards.

Expand full comment

Hello!

Yes, there are random fibers found in nature. Spider webs are strong fibers. Aslépiades (North Eastern indigenous plant) have long duvet like parachutes floating seeds, dandelions and many other plants might also shed their fiber woody materials when crushed or dead.

They float in the sky, scattered by the winds… until they land down in Will’s petri glass. :)

Regards.

Expand full comment

Hi Will!

FYI. These informations were also posted on Karl’s substack.

Mechanism of organoclay dispersion and exfoliation during melt processing. See figures 4 and 5: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032386108003157

SNC Fibers

https://www.sncfibers.com/cnf-from-pan (See pictures of the fibers)

Electrospinning produces nanofibers with a high aspect ratio, meaning they have a much greater length compared to their diameter. This high aspect ratio is advantageous for applications requiring reinforcement or enhanced mechanical properties, as well as for providing a large surface area for functionalization or adsorption purposes.

Electrospinning can produce aligned or patterned nanofiber structures by using specific collector designs or applying external electric or magnetic fields. This capability is beneficial for applications that require anisotropic properties.

Electrospinning allows for easy incorporation of various additives, such as nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, or functional groups, into the nanofibers during the electrospinning process. This capability enables the production of hybrid nanofibers with tailored properties and functionalities.

Unzipping of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube for the Development of Electrocatalytically Active Hybrid Catalyst of Graphitic Carbon and Pd Nanoparticles

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.7b01913

Expand full comment

Hello Will!

This type of optic fiber has typically side spikes. Only one of its end that splits into 3 strands, although I recently saw one (double twisted optic fibers?) with a 6 split end, a picture from Matt.

Their other end is quite different, a kind of dressmaker’s uner straight hook shaped cutter. Polyester fibers are spun, twisted, and both ends usually split in many twisted strands. Nylon is spun from a liquid and both broken ends are multi-stranded too.

I recognize this fiber pattern very easily now for its 3 strands/tendrils end has often been shown plugged to and inside Pfizer C-19 vakSins’ crystals. They are sometimes lit and colourful (darkfield) or can even convey nanotech QDs, moving lipids bubbles, small crystals, as per David’s bright field pictures and videos.

Would your last picture be one of the steps of the expansion of a hydrogel rectangle into an optic fiber? Matt has taken a few of these 4-12 bars objects and what I think is their subsequent side by side Origami style deploying optic fibers. They sometimes seem to burst out, just like in this stunning 3-D effect picture of yours.

I use the term optic fiber because I’ve seen how the huge commercial coated glass fibers ones were made (Institut national d’optique photonique, Québec City, Canada), as well as their cheap popular polymer version. They are light communication signals conveyers. Their specific wavelength proprieties are obtained by spraying the inside of giant glass bulbs with chemicals. The bulbs are heated, stretched in fragile filaments and bundled. Then, they are coated with materials specifically designed to prevent signal losses. Quantum dots have light and frequency properties and they are often seen inside the fibers, thus my analogy with optic fibers. I’ve posted my comment about the OFs on David’s site in October 2022. At that time, he called them « ribbons ».

For information purposes for your readers, microscopy can be quite exhausting for the solitary micronauts. It's like trying to take a picture while having a bright spotlight in the face. Sometimes, the quick movements of the vernier stun or make one nauseous.

However, as far as I am concerned, the content of these small glass plates offered to my fertile imagination a tiny world of beauties. I could spend hours, or even days, admiring them. I admit that I bitterly regretted throwing in the trash some photos that I considered a little blurry when I saw, on the frontispiece page of the Scientific American, a microphotography of Vitamin C a hundred times worse... LOL!

This said, your pictures are as meaningful as beautiful! So, please, do us the huge favor of continuing to display them.

Kind regards.

P. S. Are you THE Will who also attends David’s Zooms?

Expand full comment

Hi Danyele,

Thank you for providing some much appreciated insight into the manufacturing of these various fibers. In my observations, I admit I've found it puzzling to distinguish what might be expected through the course of daily existence; and what may be present in some covert manner. I've noted a wide variety of sizes, forms, and states of these fibers/filaments/optics, what have you. I can only state for certain that strange things seem to be taking place down on the microscopic level. Perhaps it's the way things have always been(Im still new to all this). But we here have seen & heard enough to be confident that's not entirely the case. David has provided a very instructive guiding light to help us begin sorting the unsortable. I do attend his meetings regularly and please forgive me if we've met there before. I tend to focus on my microscope during meetings, so I'm not always the best with associating names and faces until I've had a more direct introduction. So please say hello next time we're both in attendance! I look forward to sharing and learning more as we continue this work.

Expand full comment

Hi Will !

I really understand what you and many other micronauts are going through and I’m trying as well to identify these unknown materials and processes that you found and shared with us enthusiastically.

Optic microscopy has its limits. There might be subatomic particles and processes at work here too, at even smaller scales. However, as I commented previously, no one has taken a timed lapse video, except David. He could teach others how to program their microscope to take a slow motion video frame by frame (i. e. 15 seconds shots each 15 minutes for 12 to 24 hours) of a hydrogel aggregate or of an optic fibre transforming, with and without blood addition. I still don’t know why I feel that it is of utter importance to understand that in particular. Who knows, that could be the key to basic processes of all the other transformations/constructions. But, who am I to make any suggestions to the specialists?

We have not been introduced officially yet. Besides donating to David and Karl ko-Fis, I am a multidisciplinary artist who also reads a lot of scientific papers from ALL fields. As a photographer and painter, my mind is gifted with the weird capacity to memorize and to distinguish subtle luminosity, shadows, forms and objects through their various states. May I ask what is your background?

I appear as an anonymous participant on Zoom, which keeps identifying me by my last name, but David always greets me as Danyèle. On last and previous meetings, you sent me some of your pictures directly and I’ve commented them… I prefer not to speak for I suffer from tinnitus; sometimes it is so loud that I can barely hear what is said and I can’t read foreign Aussi, Kiwi or British accents on lips yet. :) :) :)

In 2022, I had forwarded David a MSWord data base template meant to help researchers worldwide identify and classifie with a common terminology and visuals the various forms of these crystals, bubbles, ribbons, microchips, hydrogel blobs, unopened gel envelopes, etc. At that time, I’d been told that there was no time to maintain such a database. I, nonetheless, think that it would have been a useful tool to all micronauts. Far from being a computer wizard, I always had fun building templates and transferring raw data from various programs/sources to data bases. I think it was on a David’s Zoom that someone recently brought back the idea. I could be of some help with that.

I very much appreciate your work because you focus on details the others do not seem to see, just as I would.

See you on next Zoom meeting!

Take good care.

Expand full comment

Great work, Thank you! "Love fertile fields of fibrous f*ckery"!

Expand full comment

Hello Will!

Awesome pictures! As usual, you managed to make my imagination bubble -pun intended!

Are theses OF giving birth to QDs (#1), grey balls in the fiber’s pea pod-like (#7), NLP pools + QDs (#3), hydrogel blobs (#2 and #3)?

Your last picture is of utmost complexity: 3-D depth effects, hydrogel, nano lipids bubbles (?), grey velvet balls and characteristic OF side spikes all in the same picture!!! Do you happen to have more images taken at different focus and magnification? They probably would show QDs as well.

I could be wrong but, a crossed reference with Matt’s pictures from the 7 bars has to be made (https://woodnstone820.substack.com/p/just-a-follow-up-from-the-last-post), and DFReality’s pink hydrogel crystals pictures #D4 to #D8 (https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-forced-evolution-of-humanity ) being their previous stage.

It’s hard sometimes to differentiate if it is these squares, OFs or the hydrogel blobs that create the black pools (NLPs, according to Dr. Anna) or vice versa. This applies to OFs relationships with other structures. On the other hand, the fusion/connection of the OFs to nano chips is well documented, but that with black pools and hydrogel squares has yet to be determined.

So far, I have not seen any photos or video that would explain without a doubt the initial process of hydrogel square-envelope/blobs, dark pools (is there something inside that is not visible?), micro chips crystals with QDs and OFs.

Many questions remain, as David once commented…

See you on next meeting!

Kind regards.

Expand full comment

Thank you Danyele! I appreciate the comparison to matt's incredible and dumbfounding image. If the world functioned sanely, images like his would serve as show-stoppers. Demanding all hands on deck until the causes and sources are properly identified. Alas.

Unfortunately, I don't think I have many more images of that particular object you're inquiring about. My methods are undoubtedly crude and organization has never been my strong suit, so whatever it was, I'll likely never find it again. But that's also the amazing thing about microscopy, there's always something new see. So I'll keep looking and appreciating all the input I receive from amazing contributors such as yourself. 😄

Expand full comment