I can't get over how incredibly different the visuals + reactions are with all this testing. Perfect piece of vision - so very clear and quite a depth of field watching the very bright illuminated fibre? at the end, could see deep deep in to the sample as though it was a huge body of water.
Well, pushing my scientific rigor capabilities to their absolute max, I did endeavor to examine the effects of acetone alone under the scope. The results are explosive and remarkable in their own right, but nothing quite like what we see here. I attribute the difference to whatever results from combining the test kit reagent with the swab (spongy head, not bristly), roll-stamping on a slide, and applying a droplet of acetone. The only other factor I can confirm is present are the ubiquitous fibers that quickly find their way to all my slides no matter what I do.
Trippy!
Microscopic Milky Way.
I can't get over how incredibly different the visuals + reactions are with all this testing. Perfect piece of vision - so very clear and quite a depth of field watching the very bright illuminated fibre? at the end, could see deep deep in to the sample as though it was a huge body of water.
Nanobots? What else? Thanks for looking at this, I have been wondering about the swabs.
Well, pushing my scientific rigor capabilities to their absolute max, I did endeavor to examine the effects of acetone alone under the scope. The results are explosive and remarkable in their own right, but nothing quite like what we see here. I attribute the difference to whatever results from combining the test kit reagent with the swab (spongy head, not bristly), roll-stamping on a slide, and applying a droplet of acetone. The only other factor I can confirm is present are the ubiquitous fibers that quickly find their way to all my slides no matter what I do.